11/19/2023 0 Comments Best gpu for autocadThe RX 6900 XT trails the RTX 3080, and even the RX 6800 XT manages to go toe-to-toe with the TITAN RTX, and place ahead of the RTX 6000 – at least at 4K. Here, NVIDIA rules the roost with its RTX 3090 and RTX 3080, although AMD’s latest top-end cards don’t fall too far behind. Like 3ds Max, Maya’s developers don’t begrudge gaming graphics cards, and in fact, they go through the effort of testing a massive collection of generations-old cards for its performance reports. For most users of SNX, we feel safe in suggesting either the Quadro RTX 4000 or Radeon Pro W5700, assuming you’re confident that an 8GB frame buffer will not hold you back before you can jump to the next upgrade. We wouldn’t have expected it to soar past the WX 9100 like this, but it’s nice to see AMD’s current RPros have unexpected surprises. On the AMD side, the RDNA1-supported Radeon Pro W5700’s flies past the previous top-end WX 7100 and WX 9100 cards. We’d again expect the new A6000 to push even further ahead, especially at 4K. The ultimate performance level in SNX belongs to NVIDIA’s top-end cards, and most specifically, the Quadro RTX 6000. As we saw in SVP13, AMD’s gaming cards continue to outperform NVIDIA’s gaming cards by a fair margin, although because of those driver optimizations put in place, even the lowly Quadro P2200 – with its modest 5GB frame buffer – manages to double the performance of the RX 6900 XT. Siemens NX is developed around the expectation that a workstation graphics card is going to be used, as the horrendous performance of the gaming GPUs here highlights. For our Blender testing, we report frame rate information using the grueling LookDev mode. The resulting score may seem like a simple metric, but that one number is generated after performing many different sub-tests. With SPECviewperf, the higher the score, the better the overall performance. You can see some previews of the available workloads tested below, although many more are weighed into the final performance metric. AMD Radeon Driver: Adrenalin 21.1.1 AMD Radeon Pro Driver: Enterprise 20.Q4 NVIDIA GeForce Driver: GeForce 461.40 NVIDIA Quadro Driver: GeForce 461.40 All product links in this table are affiliated, and support the website. OS and chipset driver are fully updated before testing.Īll testing was performed on our Ryzen 9 5950X workstation w/ DDR4-3200 8GBx4 Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro. Beefier frame buffers can help with that, however. Whereas you may see optimizations for improved viewport performance, there are no such optimizations that will impact rendering the same way. There are times when the trade-off of slightly reduced viewport performance can be accepted if the rendering performance is so much better. While some GPUs in the charts below will deliver better viewport performance than the others, they may pale in comparison when it comes to rendering. When choosing a new graphics card for creator purposes, it’s important to consider more than one performance metric. It’s up to you or your company whether or not you’ll suffice with the gaming counterparts, but the professional models feature advanced support, sometimes ECC memory, and in some cases, driver optimizations that propel viewport performance forward in CAD suites (some of which will be seen here). While many developers behind much of this software would quickly suggest using a Radeon Pro or Quadro over a gaming GPU, there are many cases when those gaming GPUs offer the better bang-for-the-buck. We’ve tested a total of 17 graphics cards for this performance look.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |